Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: Mid-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Paravalvular leaks (PVL) are a frequent complication following surgical valve replacement, occurring in 5% to 18% of prosthetic valves. Incidence varies according to valve position, ranging from 2% to 10% in aortic valves and from 7% to 17% in mitral valves. While many PVLs remain asymptomatic and clinically insignificant, others may lead to severe complications such as heart failure and hemolytic anemia, often requiring repeat intervention.

In recent years, transcatheter PVL closure (PVLc) has become established as a minimally invasive alternative, particularly in patients at high or prohibitive surgical risk. Previously reported short-term results have confirmed that PVLc is a safe and effective option. However, data regarding mid- and long-term outcomes remain limited.

The aim of this study was to evaluate mid-term outcomes and identify predictors of mortality or surgical reintervention at 2 years following the procedure.

Resultados a 2 años del cierre transcatéter de leak paravalvular: supervivencia y necesidad de reintervención

A total of 213 symptomatic patients underwent 237 procedures. The mean age was 68 ± 11 years, with a median EuroSCORE II of 6. PVL involved the mitral valve in 64.6% of cases and mechanical prostheses in 53.3%. Heart failure and hemolytic anemia were present in 89.5% and 49.8% of patients, respectively. The transapical approach was used in 6.8% of procedures.

Read also: After a Major Bleeding Event in Atrial Fibrillation: When Should Left Atrial Appendage Closure Be Considered?

Technical success was achieved in 87.3% of cases, and clinical success at one month was observed in 70.5% of patients. The median follow-up was 24.4 months. Two-year survival free from surgical reintervention was 66.1% (95% confidence interval: 60.1–72.7). Multivariable analysis identified mitral PVL, mechanical valves, and hemolytic anemia as independent risk factors for adverse outcomes during follow-up. Lack of clinical success at one month was the strongest predictor of adverse outcomes (HR: 5.00; 95% CI: 2.70–9.09; p = 0.001).

Conclusion 

Transcatheter PVL closure represents a durable therapeutic strategy in high-risk patients, provided early clinical success is achieved. Mitral involvement, the presence of mechanical prostheses, and hemolytic anemia emerge as key adverse predictors in this population.

Original Title: Medium-term outcomes and prognostic factors after transcatheter paravalvular leak closure: an international prospective multicentre registry.

Reference: Grégoire Albenque et al EuroIntervention 2026;22:e113-e122.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...