High doses of Rosuvastatin in acute coronary syndromes

Original title: Rosuvastatin calcium in acute coronary sydromes Reference: Aggarwal, R. et al, Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy , Volume 14, Number 9, June 2013 , pp. 1215-1227(13).

Lowering cholesterol of low density lipoproteins (LDL-C) by reducing inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-metilgutaril coenzyme A (HMGCoA) statins has proven advantageous for the survival of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). These patients still have a significant risk of cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction despite high compliance with secondary prevention treatments indicated by current guidelines. In this sense, the article warns that there remains a need to assess the possible positive effects of more intensive lowering of LDL-C after the presentation of ACS. Rosuvastatin is the most potent statins currently available and has some unique pharmacological properties that may offer advantages to these patients.

 The authors conducted a MEDLINE literature search to identify studies of Rosuvastatin and the use of statins in acute coronary syndrome that had been published in English. In this analysis the pharmacology of Rosuvastatin was described and its efficacy and tolerability were analyzed. Likewise they evaluated published studies on the treatment of ASC with statins and offered an opinion about the use of Rosuvastatin with ASC. After analysis, the authors determined that evidence is available from clinical studies to confirm the effectiveness of reducing LDL-C and tolerability suitable for high-dose Rosuvastatin in acute coronary syndrome. Although there are logical theoretical reasons to take into account about the early use of high-dose of Rosuvastatin in ASC, the level of evidence available still justifies a complete change regarding the current treatment pattern.

 Source: Medcenter.com, the leading Latin American medical portal  

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....