Post TAVI LVEF Improvement: Only with No New Conduction Defects

Original title: Impact of a New Conduction Defect Alter Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation on Left Ventricular Function Reference: Rainer Hoffmann, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2012;5:1257– 63.

TAVI development in high risk patients can produce new conduction defects and require a definitive pacemaker in almost a third of treated patients. 

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of new conduction defects after TAVI on left ventricular function at 1 year follow up. The prospective analysis included 90 consecutive patients between January 2009 and July 2010.

Implanted valves were Corevalve in 52 patients and Edwards SAPIENS in 38. LV volumes and ejection fraction were similar in both groups prior to procedure. New conduction defects presented in 39 patients, 31 of these patients presented left bundle branch block (12 finally requiring permanent pacing) and 8 patients presented complete AV block and definite pacemaker implantation. New conduction defects presented in 32 of the Core Valve implanted patients and 7 of those who received the Edwards SAPIENS valve.

Patients who did not present new conduction defects showed significant improvement of LVEF compared to baseline (5.8 ± 7.9%; p= 0.001) and end -systolic volume. In the group of patients that presented new conduction defects the LVEF practically did not show changes at 12 months. There was no difference in LVEF associated to the implanted valve. The presence of new conduction defects and baseline LVEF were predictors of reduced LVEF at 12 months.

Conclusion 

Ejection fraction after TAVI improves in those patients that do not present new conduction defects, this does not happen in patients that do present new conduction defects.

Editorial Comment:

Despite de fact that new conduction defects and permanent pacing requirements after TAVI are frequent, this does not necessarily translate into greater mortality, despite the ventricular function may see no improvement. Although surgery has brought less conduction defects, it has been performed in less complex patients compared to the ones treated with this technique; this may be contributing to new conduction defects. As regards valves, they will eventually require improvement in order to reduce such complications. 

Courtesy of Dr Carlos Fava,
Interventional Cardiologist,
Favaloro Foundation, Argentina.

Dr. Carlos Fava para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...