Cilostazol reduces restenosis of DES in lesions larger than 40 mm.

Original title: Comparison of Dual Versus Triple Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent According to Stent Length (from the Pooled Analysis of DECLARE Trials). Reference: Seung-Whan Lee et al. Am J Cardiol 2013, article in press.

Cilostazol, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase III , associated with aspirin and clopidogrel showed decrease angiographic restenosis both in conventional stents as well as in DES. DECLARE-DIABETES and DECLARE-LONG I and II studies yielded these results, however the question remained regarding which patients would benefit most and the absence of clear criteria that triple therapy did not come into daily practice.

This paper analyzed the angiographic follow up of the 1399 patients randomized to dual therapy (aspirin + clopidogrel) or triple therapy (aspirin + clopidogrel + cilostazol) in the 3 studies mentioned above. The primary objective of the study was to find stent restenosis indicators that justify cilostazol indication after angioplasty using DES. In the group with a triple scheme, in-stent restenosis was significantly reduced (8.2 % vs 13.6 % , RR 0.6 , CI 0.53 to 0.84, P = 0.003 ) and in- segment restenosis (9.0 % vs 15.7 %, RR 0.58 , CI 0.53 to 0.65 , p = 0.001). The cutoff in stent length from which benefit was significant with cilostazol was 39.5 mm. By dividing patients according to the length of stents implanted ( ≤ 20, 20 to 40 and ≥ 40 mm) we observed a significant difference in favor of the group receiving Cilostazol, -those who received ≥ 40 mm           (12.4 % vs 22.1 % , p = 0.008 ) . A similar trend was observed after dividing patients according to minimal luminal diameter ( ≤ 2.5, 2.5 to 3, and > 3 mm) with the greatest benefit in the smallest diameter ( p = 0.022 to ≤ 2.5 mm ) . 

Conclusion:

The triple scheme group (aspirin, clopidogrel, cilostazol) showed a significant reduction of restenosis in patients with more than 40 mm of stent length. Therefore, the use of the triple therapy may be readily employed in clinical practice after angioplasty using DES.

Editorial Comment

From a practical standpoint, the total length covered by stents is a simple guide for the indication of cilostazol after implantation of DES. Angiographic follow-up in these studies was set at 6 months (DECLARE-DIABETES y LONG I) and 8 months (DECLARE-LONG II), which is relatively premature and may be sub-estimated the restenosis. Drug-eluting stents used were mostly from 1st  generation so we must be cautious in extrapolating the results to the newer generations.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....