Noncardiac surgery is safe after 6 months after implantation of a DES

Original title: Risk of major adverse cardiac events following noncardiac surgery in patients with coronary stents. Reference: Hawn MT et al. JAMA 2013;DOI:10.1001

In the patients who underwent non cardiac surgery and had coronary angioplasty with stent history  within 2 years there was not increased in major cardiac events (MACE ) with the exception of those who were operated on emergency or had advanced heart disease. In contrast those who received angioplasty at least 6 months prior to surgery showed no increased risk of MACE beyond the type of stent used.

Currently guides suggest waiting at least 6 weeks for the case of a conventional stent and a year after a drug-eluting stent (DES) but according to this study, both stents have an increased risk at the beginning and for both stents the risk reaches base at 6 months. This study is a multicenter retrospective analysis ( Veterans Affairs and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) that included 41989 patients. Between 2000 and 2010 patients 124844 patients were treated with stents, of which 22.5 % were undergoing noncardiac surgery within 2 years. For those who underwent surgery within the first 6 weeks after angioplasty MACE rate was 11.6 % for those operated between 6 weeks and 6 months MACE rate was 6.4 %. Between 6 months and a year and between the first year and the second; the MACE rate was 4.2 % and 3.5 % respectively. The risk of events was also different between patients receiving drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (5.1% versus 4.3 % respectively, p < 0.001 ). However on multivariate analysis only admission for emergency surgery , history of stroke within 6 months after surgery and low cardiac index were predictors of MACE. Of course it is a retrospective registry and this is a major limitation of the study.

Conclusion: 

In patients who undergo noncardiac surgery within 2 years of coronary angioplasty with stent we only observed increased risk of events in those with emergency surgery or advanced heart disease but no difference with respect to the type of stent or at the time of the surgery if this was done at least 6 months later. The emphasis of the guidelines on the stent type and surgical time for drug-eluting stents and conventional, should be reevaluated

Medscape

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....