A new paradigm in the treatment of in-stent restenosis?

Original title: ISAR DESIRE 3: Drug-eluting balloon is best option for restenosis of limus-eluting stents Reference: Dr Robert Byrne. TCT 2012. Miami, Fl.

The first of the ISAR DESIRE trials showed that drug-eluting stents (DES) were the best strategy for treating restenosis of a bare metal stent, the second ISAR DESIRE trial tested the hypothesis of changing or not the drug for Cypher restenosis. Today, because of the newly developed paclitaxel-eluting balloons, a third ISAR DESIRE test was needed. 

The ISAR DESIRE 3 was designed to answer the question of what is the best strategy to treat restenosis of sirolimus-eluting DES. The trial included 402 patients with stenosis > 50% from a limus DES group, (everolimus, sirolimus or zotarolimus), plus signs or symptoms of ischemia and randomized to paclitaxel-eluting balloon, (SeQuent Please B Braun Vascular, Melsungen, Germany), paclitaxel eluting stent, (Taxus Boston Scientific, Natick, MA), or conventional balloon angioplasty. Left main coronary artery (LMCA) injury was excluded, as well as myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. The angiographic 6-8 month follow-up showed restenosis of at least 50% (binary restenosis), of 26.5% for paclitaxel-eluting balloons, 24% (p = 0.61) for Taxus and 56.7% for conventional balloon. Target revascularization lesion was 22.1% for the paclitaxel eluting balloon, 13.5% (p = 0.09) for Taxus and 43.5% for the conventional balloon. In the safety analysis, there were no differences in death, myocardial infarction or lesion thrombosis among the 3 groups.

Conclusion: 

The paclitaxel-eluting balloon was not inferior to Taxus, and both were superior to a conventional balloon when treating a sirolimus-eluting DES restenosis.

Commentary:

The DES restenosis has reached a plateau despite the new generations and while it is still relatively uncommon, it remains a problem. After the many studies done on the subject, this completely changes the strategy with the advantage of not having a new layer of struts in the lesion or shortening dual antiplatelet therapy times.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...