Less Definite Thrombosis with Everolimus Eluting Stents

Original title: Three-Year Outcomes After Revascularization With Everolimus-and Sirulimus -Eluting Stents From the SORT OUT IV Trial. Reference: Lisette Okkels Jensen et al. J Am CollCardiolIntv, 2014;7: 840-8.

Drug eluting stents (DES) have been shown to safely and effectively reduce restenosis compared to bare-metal stents. While the risk of thrombosis remains a matter of concern when it comes to first generation DES, several studies have shown reduced thrombosis risk with second generation stents. This study compared the safety and efficacy of sirolimus (SES) vs. everolimus (EES) eluting stents as to late thrombosis at 3 year follow up of a SORT OUT IV group of patients. 

2,774 patients were randomized, 1,390 to EES and 1,384 to SES, all of them with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome and, at least, one >50% lesion. Primary end point was MACE and definite thrombosis. Double antiagregation therapy was administered from stenting procedure to one year. The clinical characteristics of both groups were similar.

At 3 years, MACE occurred in 9.8% of EES patients and 11.1% of SES patients. We also observed a definite thrombosis rate of 0.2% in EES patients vs. 1.4% in SES patients, attributable to very late thrombosis (> 12 months) in 0.1% EES vs. 0.8% SES.

Conclusion

The 3 year follow up did no show superiority as regards MACE; however, it did find a significant reduction of in-stent thrombosis presentation, both global and very late in the EES group, especially the latter. 

Editorial Comment

The SORT OUT IV, as well as the following studies that used their data to assess the efficacy of both stents in different subgroups, obtained similar MACE rates. This is the first time both stents are compared to assess their performance with respect to very late thrombosis. The study showed a significant reduction of in-stent thrombosis in the EES group that maximized in the late stages of treatment, when patients were on-aspirin only. The number of thrombosis events in both groups was not enough to modify MACE rates, but with a larger population, this figures would also have seen a reduction.

Courtesy of Dr. Alfonso Francisco Balaguer Quiroga.
Interventional Cardiologist. International Clinic. Lima, Perú.

Alfonso Francisco Balaguer Quiroga

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....