Less Definite Thrombosis with Everolimus Eluting Stents

Original title: Three-Year Outcomes After Revascularization With Everolimus-and Sirulimus -Eluting Stents From the SORT OUT IV Trial. Reference: Lisette Okkels Jensen et al. J Am CollCardiolIntv, 2014;7: 840-8.

Drug eluting stents (DES) have been shown to safely and effectively reduce restenosis compared to bare-metal stents. While the risk of thrombosis remains a matter of concern when it comes to first generation DES, several studies have shown reduced thrombosis risk with second generation stents. This study compared the safety and efficacy of sirolimus (SES) vs. everolimus (EES) eluting stents as to late thrombosis at 3 year follow up of a SORT OUT IV group of patients. 

2,774 patients were randomized, 1,390 to EES and 1,384 to SES, all of them with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome and, at least, one >50% lesion. Primary end point was MACE and definite thrombosis. Double antiagregation therapy was administered from stenting procedure to one year. The clinical characteristics of both groups were similar.

At 3 years, MACE occurred in 9.8% of EES patients and 11.1% of SES patients. We also observed a definite thrombosis rate of 0.2% in EES patients vs. 1.4% in SES patients, attributable to very late thrombosis (> 12 months) in 0.1% EES vs. 0.8% SES.

Conclusion

The 3 year follow up did no show superiority as regards MACE; however, it did find a significant reduction of in-stent thrombosis presentation, both global and very late in the EES group, especially the latter. 

Editorial Comment

The SORT OUT IV, as well as the following studies that used their data to assess the efficacy of both stents in different subgroups, obtained similar MACE rates. This is the first time both stents are compared to assess their performance with respect to very late thrombosis. The study showed a significant reduction of in-stent thrombosis in the EES group that maximized in the late stages of treatment, when patients were on-aspirin only. The number of thrombosis events in both groups was not enough to modify MACE rates, but with a larger population, this figures would also have seen a reduction.

Courtesy of Dr. Alfonso Francisco Balaguer Quiroga.
Interventional Cardiologist. International Clinic. Lima, Perú.

Alfonso Francisco Balaguer Quiroga

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...