Greater platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving DES and clopidogrel

Original title: Impact of diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome on acute and chronic on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing drug-eluting stent placement. Reference: Feldman L. et al. Am Heart J. 2014; Epub ahead of print.

Diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) or metabolic syndrome patients undergoing drug eluting stent implantation have 3 to 4 more chances of presenting residual platelet reactivity after a clopidogrel loading dose than those that do not suffer any of these conditions.

 Previous studies comparing chronic on clopidogrel platelet reactivity in patients with T2DM vs. non diabetic and in obese vs. non obese had showed contradicting outcomes.

This study included 159 patients receiving coronary angioplasty with DES and compared high platelet reactivity prevalence in T2DM or metabolic syndrome patients vs. patients with neither of these conditions. Platelet function was measured with a previous 600 mg clopidogrel loading dose and at 4 months on clopidogrel 75 mg treatment. 

High reactivity prevalence was greater in diabetic patients and in patients with metabolic syndrome after clopidogrel loading dose, even though at 4 months this high reactivity was seen only in diabetic patients.

By multivariable analysis, diabetes (OR 3.62, IC 95%, 1.34 to 9.80; p=0.011), the metabolic syndrome (OR 4.00, IC 95% 1.39 to 11.46; p=0010) and the chronic previous treatment with clopidogrel (OR 0.22, IC 95% 0.09-0.49; p=0.001) were independent predictors of high on clopidogrel platelet reactivity.

Conclusion

Both the metabolic syndrome and T2DM were independent predictors of high on clopidogrel platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading dose. This findings may be clinically relevant.

Editorial Comment

High platelet reactivity is associated to ischemic events, which is why several trials aim to reduce platelet reactivity by increasing clopidogrel loading dose or by choosing more powerful antiplatelets. Despite some of the outcomes may be favorable, the clinical efficacy of this changes remains unclear. 

SOLACI

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...