Predictors of Carotid Occlusion Intolerance during Proximal Protected Carotid Artery Stenting

Original title: Predictors of Carotid Occlusion Intolerance During Proximal Protected Carotid Artery Stenting. Reference: Giuseppe Giugliano et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2014, Epub ahead of print.

Proximal endovascular occlusion devices (PEO) have been proved particularly effective and safe for proximal protected carotid stenting procedures. However, endovascular occlusion can expose the ipsilateral hemisphere to hypoperfusion and produce transient neurological symptoms.

Between March 2010 and 2012, 605 consecutive patients undergoing proximal protected carotid stenting in one center were included in this trial (Mo.Ma, Medtronic Inc., Santa Rosa, California). In order to identify independent predictors of carotid occlusion intolerance, multivariate logistic regression model was developed that included all clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics of patients.

Compared to the asymptomatic subjects, those who presented intolerance had a lower occlusion pressure (42.3 ± 12.7 vs. 61.9 ± 15.4 mmHg; p< 0.001).

The most powerful independent predictor of proximal protection intolerance was occlusion pressure, with best cutoff being ≤40 mmHg (sensitivity 68.5%, specificity 93.3%). The best clinical predictor was the presence of collateral internal carotid artery occlusion (OR 3.1, IC 95% 1.5 a 6.2). 

Conclusion

Transient neurological symptoms can occur in one third of patients undergoing proximal protected carotid stenting. Contralateral Carotid occlusion and a ≤ 40 mmHg occlusion pressure are the best predictors.

Editorial Comment

Proximal occlusion intolerance has not been associated to peri procedural events and symptoms completely resolve within the first 20 minutes after flow restoration. Most of the times symptoms start after stenting (during post dilation or aspiration) therefore it is possible to finish procedure under protection. Only 1% of cases started with symptoms immediately after balloon inflation, in these cases the balloon may be deflated and the system may be used as a sheath guide filtered catheterization.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

A New Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Paradigm? CREST-2 Trial Unified Results

Severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis continues to be controversial seeing the optimization of intensive medical therapy (IMT) and the availability lower periprocedural risk revascularization techniques....

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...