HeartFlowNXT: Using noninvasive FFR shows promising results

The use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) is useful to determine the significance of coronary lesions. The ability to perform this physiologicalevaluation in a noninvasive base is an interesting alternative.The primary objective of the study was to compare the noninvasive FFRusing multislice CT versus  invasive FFR. 357 patients were included in this multicenter study succeeded to demonstrate that the noninvasive FFR can improve diagnostic specificity of CT only.

5_bjarne_norgaard
Bjarne L. Nørgaard
2013-10-30

Original title: HeartFlowNXT: A Prospective, Registry Evaluation of Noninvasive FFRCT vs. Invasive FFR

More articles by this author

ADVISE II: iFFR comparable toFFRbut with out adenosine

Several studies tested the utility of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to assess coronary lesions functionally. The FFR required for its measurement amaximum hyperemia that...

CHILL-MI: Hypothermia fails to show benefit in patients with acute ST- elevation IAM.

Hypothermia improves myocardial ischemia in animals but studies in humans failed to demonstrate benefit to that extent.We admitted 120 patients experiencing anterior-posterior STEMI with...

SMART-CASE: Angiographic Guidanceangioplastyto >50% versus >70% lesions.

This prospective randomized study compared aggressive revascularization angiography injuries 50% versus a most conservative revascularization lesions>70%.The primary end point was death, myocardial infarction and...

RIBS V: Pharmacological balloon vs second-generation drug-eluting stent in the treatment of BMS restenosis

The ideal therapy for treating in-stent restenosis continues to be debated . The pharmacological balloons showed good results in this context, but no direct...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...