SECURITY: 6 months versus 12 months of dual anti-aggregation using 2nd generation DES

This multicenter noninferiority design work included 1399 patients randomized to receive 6 months (n = 682) versus 1 year (n = 717) dual anti-aggregation after implantation of 2nd generation drug-eluting stent. The primary end point was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, definite or probable thrombosis, and major bleeding. At 12 months follow-up the primary end point rate was 4.5% in those who received 6 months versus 3.7% in those who received 12 months (p = 0.469). The incidence of definite or probable thrombosis when considering separately, there were no differences (0.3% versus 0.4%, P = 0.694). 

Conclusion 

Treatment with 6 months of dual anti-aggregation was not minor than 12 months in patients who received angioplasty with 2nd generation drug-eluting stents. 

3_antonio_colombo
Antonio Colombo
2014-09-16

Original title: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Six Months Versus 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.

 

More articles by this author

OPTIMIZE: 3 months versus 12 months of dual anti-aggregation with zotarolimus-eluting stents

The current recommendation for dual anti-aggregation post-DES implantation is 12 months. However, the ideal length for specific types of stents is unclear. This study...

VELOCITY: Peritoneal hypothermia in patients undergoing primary angioplasty

There are clinics hypothesis that systemic hypothermia (≤34.9) could reduce infarct size if set before reperfusion. Peritoneal lavage had a well-established safety profile and...

TRANSLATE-ACS: One-year prasugrel versus clopidogrel after acute coronary syndrome

Platelet inhibition is critical in reducing atherothrombotic risk in the short and long term after an acute coronary syndrome, especially if the patient has...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | Protect The Head-To-Head Trial: Randomized Comparison Between Emboliner and Sentinel During TAVI

Ischemic stroke remains one of the most feared complications of TAVI, with a relatively low but persistent incidence of 2–4%, without significant reduction over...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...