Different Options for Aspirin Hypersensitivity in PCI

Original Title: Efficacy and Safety of Available Protocols for Aspirin Hypersensitivity for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Survey and Systematic Review. Reference: Bianco M et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan;9(1):e002896.

The follow up strategy for aspirin hypersensitive patients undergoing PCI remains unclear.

A systematic search included 283 patients from 11 studies. Primary end point was discharge with aspirin, while adverse events rate was the secondary end point.

Only one of the studies performed an endovenous desensitization protocol that was highly effective (98%) and saw few adverse events, compared to the rest of protocols with oral administration of escalating doses of aspirin.

There were no significant differences among the oral desensitization protocols (more vs. less fractioned) in terms of efficacy, while the incidence of rash and angioedema were higher in those protocols using less than 6 doses escalation.

During follow up, 65% of physicians managed aspirin hypersensitivity by changing the therapeutic regimen (e.g. Clopidogrel as monotherapy).
Despite prior safety data, desensitization protocols were used only by 42% of cardiologists.

Conclusion
The existing protocols to treat aspirin hypersensitivity are safe and effective and represent a viable option for patients that need dual antiaggregation therapy and are allergic to aspirin.

Editorial Comment
One of the desensitization protocols is the oral administration of 6 escalating doses of aspirin (1, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 100 mg) in 5.5 hours with or without simultaneous administration of corticoids and antihistamines. According to this study, consecutive doses should not be less than 6, because of the higher chance of angioedema and rash.

More articles by this author

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Transcatheter Deep Vein Arterialization in Critical Limb Ischemia Without Revascularization Options

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia in patients without conventional revascularization options represents one of the most challenging scenarios within peripheral arterial disease, with 1-year major amputation...

Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: Mid-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Paravalvular leaks (PVL) are a frequent complication following surgical valve replacement, occurring in 5% to 18% of prosthetic valves. Incidence varies according to valve...

After a Major Bleeding Event in Atrial Fibrillation: When Should Left Atrial Appendage Closure Be Considered?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who experience a major bleeding event represents a complex clinical scenario in which percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)...