Different Options for Aspirin Hypersensitivity in PCI

Original Title: Efficacy and Safety of Available Protocols for Aspirin Hypersensitivity for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Survey and Systematic Review. Reference: Bianco M et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan;9(1):e002896.

The follow up strategy for aspirin hypersensitive patients undergoing PCI remains unclear.

A systematic search included 283 patients from 11 studies. Primary end point was discharge with aspirin, while adverse events rate was the secondary end point.

Only one of the studies performed an endovenous desensitization protocol that was highly effective (98%) and saw few adverse events, compared to the rest of protocols with oral administration of escalating doses of aspirin.

There were no significant differences among the oral desensitization protocols (more vs. less fractioned) in terms of efficacy, while the incidence of rash and angioedema were higher in those protocols using less than 6 doses escalation.

During follow up, 65% of physicians managed aspirin hypersensitivity by changing the therapeutic regimen (e.g. Clopidogrel as monotherapy).
Despite prior safety data, desensitization protocols were used only by 42% of cardiologists.

Conclusion
The existing protocols to treat aspirin hypersensitivity are safe and effective and represent a viable option for patients that need dual antiaggregation therapy and are allergic to aspirin.

Editorial Comment
One of the desensitization protocols is the oral administration of 6 escalating doses of aspirin (1, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 100 mg) in 5.5 hours with or without simultaneous administration of corticoids and antihistamines. According to this study, consecutive doses should not be less than 6, because of the higher chance of angioedema and rash.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....