Survivors of Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: Long Term Outcomes.

Título original: Post-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock Findings From the NCDR. Referencia: Rashmee U. Shah et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(7):739-747.

 

Even though mortality after cardiogenic shock MI is quite high, many survive and are discharged. So far, there is little we know about their prognosis after discharge.

This study sought to assess patients undergoing acute myocardial infarction included in the ACTION registry (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get with the Guidelines) post discharge. The study used proportional hazard models to test the association between cardiogenic shock and events after discharge.

Out of 112668 AMI survivors discharged, 5% presented cardiogenic shock.

Death rate was significantly higher in those presenting cardiogenic shock both at 60 days (9.6% vs. 5.5%) and one year (22.4% vs. 16.7%).

After adjusting baseline characteristics, death risk continued to be higher in those presenting cardiogenic shock within 60 days (HR: 1.62; CI 95% 1.46 to 1.80) but resulted similar after this period (HR: 1.08 between day 61 and 365; CI 95% 1.00 to 1.18).

All cause rehospitalization or death rates also resulted higher in cardiogenic shock patients at 60 days (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.21 to 1.35) and after this period the risk matched non cardiogenic shock patients (HR: 0.95 between day 61 and 365; CI 95% 0.89 to 1.01).

Conclusion
For cardiogenic shock survivors, death and or rehospitalization rates are time dependent and concentrates in the first 60 days after discharge. After this period, prognosis resulted similar to that of patients with no cardiogenic shock.

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...