Survivors of Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: Long Term Outcomes.

Título original: Post-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock Findings From the NCDR. Referencia: Rashmee U. Shah et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(7):739-747.

 

Even though mortality after cardiogenic shock MI is quite high, many survive and are discharged. So far, there is little we know about their prognosis after discharge.

This study sought to assess patients undergoing acute myocardial infarction included in the ACTION registry (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get with the Guidelines) post discharge. The study used proportional hazard models to test the association between cardiogenic shock and events after discharge.

Out of 112668 AMI survivors discharged, 5% presented cardiogenic shock.

Death rate was significantly higher in those presenting cardiogenic shock both at 60 days (9.6% vs. 5.5%) and one year (22.4% vs. 16.7%).

After adjusting baseline characteristics, death risk continued to be higher in those presenting cardiogenic shock within 60 days (HR: 1.62; CI 95% 1.46 to 1.80) but resulted similar after this period (HR: 1.08 between day 61 and 365; CI 95% 1.00 to 1.18).

All cause rehospitalization or death rates also resulted higher in cardiogenic shock patients at 60 days (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.21 to 1.35) and after this period the risk matched non cardiogenic shock patients (HR: 0.95 between day 61 and 365; CI 95% 0.89 to 1.01).

Conclusion
For cardiogenic shock survivors, death and or rehospitalization rates are time dependent and concentrates in the first 60 days after discharge. After this period, prognosis resulted similar to that of patients with no cardiogenic shock.

More articles by this author

DAPT ≤30 Days After Drug-Coated Balloon Coronary Angioplasty

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) coronary angioplasty without stent implantation has become a well-established alternative in several clinical scenarios, particularly in patients at high bleeding risk...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Redo-TAVI with SAPIEN 3: 30-Day Outcomes

The indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have rapidly expanded to include intermediate- and low-risk patients, extending its use to younger individuals with...

DAPT ≤30 Days After Drug-Coated Balloon Coronary Angioplasty

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) coronary angioplasty without stent implantation has become a well-established alternative in several clinical scenarios, particularly in patients at high bleeding risk...

Coronary artery disease progression after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: quantitative coronary angiography and Quantitative Flow Ratio analysis

The coexistence of coronary artery disease and severe aortic stenosis is common among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the impact of...