Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Effective to Reduce Risk of Stroke?

Original Title: Effectiveness of Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion Procedures to Reduce the Risk of Stroke: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Reference: North Noelck et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. July 2016. Published ahead of print.

 
Left Atrial Appendage ClosureAtrial fibrillation is an important cause of stroke. Oral anticoagulation reduces the risk of stroke but, on the other hand, increases the risk of bleeding. Left atrial appendage closure procedures have been designed to isolate the left atrial appendage (LAA) from blood circulation and is an alternative to oral anticoagulation.

This study is a systematic review to assess the risks and benefits of percutaneous or surgical LAA closure.

In all, 20 studies met the pre-specified inclusion criteria, from where researchers recovered patient characteristics, and stroke, mortality and adverse events rates.  The quality and state of evidence were also assessed according to publication criteria.

Researchers found studies with low quality evidence concluding LAA closure and anticoagulation had similar risk of stroke and mortality rates, noting, however, this evidence was limited to Watchman implantation in patients eligible for oral anticoagulation at short term.

Observational studies provide stronger evidence on the possibility of periprocedural adverse events after percutaneous LAA closure with practically all available devices.

There is little evidence on surgical LAA closure in the context of heart surgery for another indication (either cardiac or vascular), but it doesn’t seem to contribute to surgery-related adverse events that. There is insufficient data to argue that surgery will reduce stroke risk.

 

Conclusion

There is limited evidence to support the Watchman might be superior to long term oral anticoagulation in selected patients. There is not enough data on the effectiveness of different devices in patients who are ineligible for oral anticoagulation. Percutaneous LAA closure is associated with a relatively high risk of periprocedural complications.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or suggestions here below.

More articles by this author

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...