Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseThere are limited data on aspirin desensitization in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of a rapid desensitization protocol inpatients with a history of aspirin sensitivity about to receive PCI.

 

This was a prospective multicenter observational study, carried out in seven Italian centers including patients with a history of aspirin hypersensitivity in the context of a coronary angiogram and eventual PCI.

 

The study included an overall of 330 patients in said conditions with a history of CAD, suspected as a stable condition, and also patients undergoing ST elevation acute myocardial infarction.

 

Prior aspirin adverse events included:

  • urticaria (n=177, 53.6%),
  • angioedema (n=69, 20.9%),
  • asthma (n=65, 19.7%),
  • anaphylactic reaction (n=19, 5.8%).

 

Among those presenting urticaria/angioedema, 13 also has a history of chronic idiopathic urticaria.

 

The desensitization procedure was done before catheterization, with the exception of patients undergoing ST elevation AMI (n=78, 23.6%), who underwent the procedure after catheterization. In these last patients, the use of IIb/IIIa glycoprotein inhibitors was left to the operator’s criteria.

aspirine

 

Desensitization involved the oral administration of six sequential doses of aspirin (1, 5, 10, 20, 40 y 100 mg) during 5.5 hours. Aspirin administration was immediately interrupted whenever there were systemic, respiratory or mucocutaneoussigns of hypersensitivity. After desensitization, patients continued to take 100 mg aspirin per day. In all elective cases, the use of corticoids, antihistamine or anti leukotrienes was interrupted seven days after desensitization.

 

Of all patients, 71% (n=235) finally required PCI. The desensitization protocol was successful in 315 patients (95.4%) and all those with a history of anaphylactic reaction.

 

The 15 patients (4.6%) that did not respond to treatment only presented minor adverse reactions that were well managed with corticosteroids and antihistamines.

 

80% continued with aspirin for at least 12 months and those who decided to discontinue treatment did so because of medical decision, not because of adverse events.

 

Conclusion

Rapid desensitization protocol resulted safe and effective in a wide range of patients regardless the type of reaction to aspirin they used to have.

 

Original Title: Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Results of the Multicenter ADAPTED Registry (Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease).

Reference: Roberta Rossini et al. CircCardiovascInterv. 2017 Feb;10(2).


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

ACC 2026 | FAST III: vFFR vs FFR in physiology-guided revascularization of intermediate coronary lesions

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions remains a cornerstone in decision-making for coronary revascularization. Although FFR continues to be one of the guideline-recommended references,...