TOPIC: Benefits of Switching Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with ACS

Newer P2Y12 blockers are the front-line treatment and dual antiplatelet therapy is indicated for 1 year after acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Balancear el riesgo de sangrado vs trombótico para definir el tiempo de doble antiagregaciónBoth prasugrel and ticagrelor offer more ischemic benefit than clopidogrel during the initial phase; however, bleeding complications could increase in the long term. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of switching dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to a newer, “more powerful” combination including aspirin plus prasugrel or ticagrelor for the first month, followed by aspirin plus clopidogrel the next 11 months after ACS.

 

Patients enrolled presented ACS and had undergone angioplasty revascularization without ischemic or bleeding events within the first month after the ACS event.

 

They were randomized to switch DAPT (aspirin plus prasugrel or ticagrelor for 1 month, followed by aspirin plus clopidogrel the next 11 months) or continuation of their DAPT regimen (aspirin plus prasugrel or ticagrelor for 12 months). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, urgent revascularization, stroke, and ≥2 bleeding (as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] classification) at 1 year. The secondary endpoint was similar but included all BARC or TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) bleeding categories.

 

A total 646 patients with ACS who had undergone angioplasty were randomized. The primary endpoint was 52% lower among patients who switched DAPT after 1 month than among those who maintained the “powerful” regimen for 1 year (13.4% for switch DAPT at 1 month vs. 26.3% for unchanged DAPT throughout the year; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.34-0.68; p < 0,01).

 

No significant differences were reported on ischaemic endpoints, which were similar for both groups (9.3% vs. 11.5%, respectively; HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.50-1.29; p = 0.36), but, as expected, there was a 70% reduction in the rate of BARC ≥2 bleeding (4.0% vs. 14.9% at 1 year, respectively; HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.18-0.50; p < 0,01).

 

Conclusion

In patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome who required angioplasty and did not experience adverse events within 1 month, a switched DAPT from a powerful aspirin plus prasugrel or ticagrelor regimen to aspirin plus clopidogrel was superior to a whole year on aspirin plus prasugrel or ticagrelor, due to the significant reduction in bleeding events without an increase in ischemic events.

 

Dr. Thomas Cuisset
Dr. Thomas Cuisset

Original title: Benefit of Switched Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TOPIC (Timing Of Platelet Inhibition after acute Coronary Syndrome) Randomized Study.

Presenter: Thomas Cuisset.

 

 

CuissetThomas


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...