DESSOLVE III: Xience vs. MiStent

DESSOLVE III: Xience vs. MiStentThe MiStent device is made of cobalt-chromium, with struts of up to 64 µm thick. It is coated with a completely absorbable polymer that contains a microcrystalline form of sirolimus that embeds directly into the vessel wall. The drug is eluted continuously for up to 9 months.

 

This was a multicenter noninferiority study that randomized patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive Xience or MiStent devices. It enrolled a total 1398 patients; about 59% of them were admitted while presenting acute coronary syndrome.

 

At 1 year, the primary endpoint was present in 6.5% of patients in the Xience groups vs. 5.8% of patients in the MiStent group, thus achieving noninferiority (p < 0.001). There were no differences as regards cardiac death (Xience 1.6% vs. MiStent 2.0%; p = 0.552), target-vessel infarction (1.9% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.716), clinically justified target-vessel revascularization (3.8% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.222) or definite thrombosis (0.7% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.480).

                                                         

Conclusion

In a 12-month follow-up, the MiStent device with early polymer absorption and sirolimus sustained release was noninferior to everolimus-eluting stent with permanent polymer Xience.

 

Dr. Robbert J. De Winter
Dr. Robbert J. De Winter

Original title: DESSOLVE III: A Randomised Comparison of Xience vs. MiStent, a Novel DES that Embeds Sirolimus Microcrystals in the Vessel Wall.

Presenter: Robbert J. de Winter.

 

 

DeWinterRobbertJ


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...