Critical ischemia in the lower limbs: Frequent Readmissions show the magnitude of this problem

Critical Ischemia in the Lower Limbs: Frequent Readmissions Show the Magnitude of This ProblemReadmissions at 6 months in patients with critical ischemia in the lower limbs occur in about 50% of all cases and most of them are unplanned.

 

This truly alarming number is cause for further concern when taking into account that only part of these readmissions are related to vascular problems. Many are caused by comorbidities such as infection or diabetes, often related to critical ischemia.

 

What this work does not say, ultimately, is that revascularization of the affected limb is not enough: physicians must ensure that all comorbidities are being properly treated.

 

In order to obtain the included data, 212,241 patients with critical ischemia in the lower limbs treated between 2009 and 2013 were analyzed.

 

At 30 days and 6 months, all-cause readmissions were 27.1% and 56.6%, respectively. Almost a fourth of all 30-day readmissions and almost half of all 6-month readmissions were unplanned.

 

A third of all unplanned readmissions were mainly due to causes related to critical ischemia or post-procedural complications, while the rest of them were a result of non-vascular causes such as sepsis or diabetes.

 

Patients who underwent surgical revascularization during index hospitalization were more prone to readmission than those revascularized endovascularly.

 

A more prolonged length of stay during index hospitalization was directly associated with the likelihood of readmission, which was, in turn, associated with higher mortality rates. A longer stay during index hospitalization could be explained simply as a result of patients who are more ill and, in turn, more likely to be readmitted. This should be a fairly simple way of predicting which patients require a closer follow-up in order to prevent unplanned readmissions.

 

Conclusion

Readmissions among patients with critical ischemia in the lower limbs are very frequent and most of them unplanned. A high number of demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors may play important roles in predicting these events.

 

Original title: Burden of Readmissions Among Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia.

Reference: Agarwal S et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69:1897-1908.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

Safety of Prophylactic Spinal Fluid Drainage in Open and Endovascular Repair of Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Spinal cord injury remains one of the most devastating complications of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, mainly associated to a compromised the Adamkiewicz artery...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....