COMPASS: A New Place for Rivaroxaban in Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease

Combining low doses of rivaroxaban and aspirin seems to be the best strategy for patients with stable chronic ischemic heart disease, according to this new study presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2017, which was published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.

COMPASS: un nuevo lugar para el rivaroxaban en cardiopatía isquémica crónica

Compared with low-dose aspirin alone, the combination of aspirin and rivaroxaban reduced the primary endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke through a follow-up of 2 years (4.1% vs. 5.4%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.86).

 

This came at the obvious cost of significantly increased major bleeding (3.1% vs. 1.9%; HR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.40-2.05). However, net clinical benefit still favors the rivaroxaban-aspirin combination.


Read also: “Ad Hoc” PCI during TAVR: No Impact on Safety or Long Term Outcomes”.


The COMPASS study was conducted at 602 centers in 33 countries and includes 27,395 patients with coronary disease, peripheral vascular disease, or both. These subjects were randomized to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily, rivaroxaban 5.0 mg twice-daily alone, or aspirin 100 mg once-daily alone. Patients who were not under treatment with a proton pump inhibitor were also randomized to pantoprazole or placebo.

 

In addition to the benefit observed as regards the primary endpoint, the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin reduced the rates of other study endpoints, such as ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, acute lower limb ischemia, or death from coronary causes.


Read also: Pacemaker Implantation After TAVI Raises Costs But Not the Incidence of Adverse Events”.


Rivaroxaban monotherapy did not exhibit any advantages over aspirin alone.

 

Original title: Rivaroxaban With or Without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease.

Presenter: Eikelboom JW.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...