TCT 2017 | REDUCE: 3 vs 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with the New Combo DES

Courtesy of SBHCI.

This new device has, on one hand, an abluminal sirolimus coating, and on the other hand, a luminal CD34 antibody coating for EPC capturing, to potentially accelerate post-PCI reendothelization.

TCT 2017 | REDUCE: 3 vs 12 meses de doble antiagregación con el nuevo DES Combo

Between 2014 and 2016, the study included 1496 patients undergoing acute coronary syndrome (ACS), receiving the new COMBO stent. These patients were randomized to 3 and 12 months of dual APT. Primary end point was a composite of death, infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, revascularization and bleeding at 12 months.


Read also: TCT 2017 | INTREPID: Mitral Replacement with a Self-Expanding Device”.


There were no differences in events between months 3 and 12 of DAPT (8.2% vs 8.4%, for non-inferiority < 0.001). There were no differences in major bleeding (2.5% vs 3%), death (1.9% vs 0.8%) or definite/probable thrombosis (1.2% vs 0.4%). However, the study did not have enough statistical power to assess these events separately.

 

Conclusion

The REDUCE study showed that 3 months DAPT are non-inferior to 12 months DAPT in ACS patients treated with the COMBO stent.

 

Courtesy of SBHCI.

 

Original title: A Randomized Trial of 3-Month vs 12-Month DAPT After Implantation of a Bioabsorbable Polymer-Based Metallic DES With a Luminal CD34+ Antibody Coating in Patients With ACS.

Presenter: Harry Suryapranata.

 

REDUCE


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....