EuroPCR 2018 | DESSOLV III: Bioabsorbable vs. Durable Polymer at 2 Years

Most drug-eluting stents are coated by a polymer that is used to contain the antiproliferative drug. Once the drug is released, the polymer remains in place and its presence has been associated with inflammation, restenosis, and neoatherosclerosis. The MiStent device features a polymer that becomes bioabsorbable once the drug has been released, which could, theoretically, reduce the inflammatory response of the treated segment. MiStent was designed to meet three requirements: a thin-strut platform, a bioabsorbable polymer that disappears from the vessel in 3 months, and a drug whose effect remains for 9 months. The last characteristic is what makes this stent stand out among other bioresorbable-polymer stents in which the effect of the drug vanishes along with the polymer.

EuroPCR 2018 | DESSOLV III: polímero bioabsorbible vs durable a 2 añosThe study included 1398 patients from 20 sites and 4 countries, 60% of whom were included in a setting of acute coronary syndrome. Subjects with diabetes, left main lesions, restenosis, or lesions in vein grafts were also eligible (a typical all-comers population). Stable patients received dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 months, while acute patients received it for a year.

 

The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization.


Read also: LEADERS FREE: Complex Angioplasty in Patients with High Risk for Bleeding.


At 2 years, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of clinical events driven by the device (8.6% for MiStent vs. 8.7% for Xience; p = 0.958).

 

There was a trend towards a lower risk for revascularization with the new device, although the difference was not significant (5.4% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.44).


Read also: EuroPCR 2018 | SPYRAL HTN-ON MED: Renal Denervation Comes Back to Life.


In the final analysis at three years, we will see if there are new differences that can be attributed to the disappearing polymer.

 

Original title: A Randomised Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Bioabsorbable Polymer-Coated Stent vs. an Everolimus-Eluting Durable Polymer Stent in an All-Comer Population – 24-Month Update.

Presenter: W. Wijns.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....