Staged Complete Revascularization vs. Culprit Vessel PCI at Long-Term

Staged complete revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease is superior to culprit PCI only at five-year follow-up.

The outcomes of this retrospective analysis show the benefit of staged PCI, though it might be attenuated in diabetic patients. Outcomes are consistent with previously published randomized studies.

Nevertheless, we should remain cautious when interpreting this study in particular, since it is an observational study on “real world” patients and could be full of confounding factors. For instance, why some patients received complete revascularization and others did not; there must have been reasons behind the difference in results.

Read also: Bariatric Surgery Associated with a Lower Rate of Mortality Due to Infarction and Stroke.

Neither does the study offer answers as regards the best moment to complete revascularization (when stages should be).

This study was recently published in the American Journal of Cardiology. It included 1205 patients undergoing ST elevation MI and multivessel disease. Around half of patients received staged PCI and the rest only culprit PCI.

Propensity score matching was used to compare groups, leaving 415 patients with similar baseline characteristics in each branch.

Read also: New Percutaneous Devices to Prevent Embolism in Atrial Fibrillation.

After a 5-year follow-up, MACCE rate was lower (all cause death, MI, stroke, and unplanned revascularization) and it resulted 30.6% for the complete revascularization groups vs 34.5% for the culprit PCI group (HR 0.7, CI 95% 0.55 to 0.89). Patients in the complete revascularization group tended to present less MI and unplanned revascularization.

Outcomes were consistent in most subgroups except for diabetic patients. These group did not present lower MACCE rate regardless the strategy.

Patients with 3 vessel disease showed a more pronounced Benefit than the general population.

The studies COMPLETE and FULL REVASC, to be published soon, are expected to look further into this and make the guidelines give more specific recommendations.

Original Title: Long-term safety and efficacy of staged percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease.

Reference: Cui K et al. Am Heart J. 2019; Epub ahead of print.

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...