ESC 2019 | THEMIS-PCI: Unlike in the Main Study, Here Ticagrelor Is Indeed Effective

This is a sub-study of the THEMIS presented during the ESC 2019 scientific sessions in Paris, and simultaneously published in Lancet.

They were all diabetics with stable coronary artery disease, but in this sub-study patients also had prior PCI.

It included over 11000 patients with prior PCI for whom the combination of ticagrelor and aspirin significantly reduced risk of death, infraction or stroke in approximately 15% vs. aspirin plus placebo (7.3% with ticagrelor vs 8.6% with placebo; p=0.01).

Ticagrelor (same as in the main study) significantly increase bleeding risk. We are talking about a two-fold higher compared against placebo as regards major bleeding (HR 2.03; CI 95% 1.48-2.76). However, fatal bleeding risk (BARC 5) or intracranial bleeding were similar between the two.


Lea también: ESC 2019 | THEMIS: ticagrelor en diabéticos con enfermedad coronaria estable.


In terms of net clinical benefit (combination of all-cause death, infarction, stroke, fatal bleeding and intracranial bleeding) outcomes favor ticagrelor in patients with prior PCI (9.3% with ticagrelor vs 11.0% with placebo; p=0.005) but not in patients with no prior PCI.

This difference between the general population (the global THEMIS) and this subgroup with a history of PCI (the THEMIS-PCI) could be explained because patients with prior PCI had already received dual antiplatelet antiaggregation therapy and therefore had passed the bleeding test. Prior PCI basically marks patients with stable coronary angina and lower risk of bleeding; these will indeed benefit from ticagrelor.

Original Title: Ticagrelor in patients with diabetes and stable coronary artery disease with a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention (THEMIS-PCI): a phase-3, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

Reference: Bhatt DL et al. Lancet. 2019; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

Ultrathin vs Thin-Strut Stents in PCI Patients at High Bleeding Risk

Several in vivo studies have shown that ultrathin stents present lower thrombogenic risk vs. thin-strut stents, which reflects in lower rates of target lesion...

Should We Withdraw Anticoagulation Before TAVR?

Approximately one-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have atrial fibrillation and are on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. This creates a complex...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...