TCT 2019 | AUGUSTUS ACS: Apixaban vs. Warfarin and Aspirin vs. Placebo in AF and ACS

Courtesy of SBHCI.

The safety and efficacy of antithrombotic and antiplatelet treatments in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted with acute coronary syndrome (who receive medical treatment or angioplasty) may vary from that in patients undergoing elective treatment.

Highlights TCT 2019

At 14 days from elective angioplasty or hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome, patients were randomized in a 2×2 factorial trial to apixaban vs. warfarin and aspirin vs. placebo; additionally, they all received a P2Y12 inhibitor for the first 6 months. Patients admitted due to acute coronary syndrome received angioplasty or medical treatment at the discretion of the treating physician.

Patients randomized to apixaban received 5 mg every/12 h unless they met two of the three risk criteria (age >80 years, weight <60 kg or creatinine 1.5 mg/dL); in that case, the dose was 2.5 mg every/12 h. Patients randomized to warfarin had a target INR between 2 and 3. Both anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies were started within 24 h from the randomization, and their duration was 6 months.


Read also: TCT 2019 | IDEAL-LM: Bioabsorbable Polymer DES vs. Permanent Polymer DES for Left Main Stenosis.


Events were analyzed according to three possible scenarios: clinically-treated acute coronary syndrome, angioplasty-treated acute coronary syndrome, and elective angioplasty.

Of the 4614 patients included, about 1097 (23.9%) were admitted due to acute coronary syndrome and underwent medical treatment, 1714 (37.3%) were admitted due to acute coronary syndrome and underwent angioplasty, and 1784 (38.8%) underwent elective angioplasty.

Compared with warfarin, apixaban reduced the number of major bleeding events in all clinical scenarios, with the same rate of ischemic events.

Aspirin patients had higher rates of bleeding in all clinical scenarios, with the same rate of ischemic events as placebo patients.

Conclusion

An antithrombotic regime with apixaban plus a P2Y12 inhibitor without aspirin was safer and just as effective in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted with acute coronary syndrome receiving medical treatment or angioplasty when compared with patients who undergo elective angioplasty.

Courtesy of SBHCI.

Link to the SBHCI publication HERE

augustus-stephan

Original Title: AUGUSTUS ACS: A 2×2 Factorial Randomized Trial of Apixaban vs. Warfarin and Aspirin vs. Placebo in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Author of the Original Title: Stephan Windecker.



Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...