Virtual ACC 2020 | TWILIGHT-COMPLEX: Ticagrelor Monotherapy in the Most “Dangerous” Angioplasties

The original TWILIGHT findings in more than 9000 patients who underwent angioplasty were presented last year at TCT and showed a 3.1% absolute risk reduction in BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding with no increase in death, infarction, or stroke in patients who received ticagrelor and placebo compared with patients who received ticagrelor and aspirin. All patients had previously received dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 months and had not experienced any bleeding or thrombotic events during that period of time.

Now, the TWILIGHT-COMPLEX trial is presented at the virtual ACC 2020 virtual while simultaneously published in J Am Coll Cardiol. This study focused on 2343 patients from the original TWILIGHT trial, who underwent complex angioplasty defined as: 3 vessels treated (9.1%), ≥3 lesions treated (29.9%), total stent length >60 mm (51.8%), bifurcation lesion with 2 stents implanted (10.7%); use of any atherectomy device (10.4%), left main disease (15.1%), venous or arterial bypass graft (6.9%), and chronic total occlusion (19%).

Compared with the main TWILIGHT population, these patients were older and more likely to have chronic kidney disease or anemia, and present acute coronary syndrome.

The primary endpoint of BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding was 4.2% in patients with complex angioplasty in the ticagrelor monotherapy group vs. 7.7% in patients in the dual antiplatelet therapy group (a similar reduction to that experienced by patients who underwent noncomplex angioplasty). A similar finding was observed for major (BARC 3 to 5) bleeding only.


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | First Results of Evolut in Low-Risk Bicuspid Valves.


Just like in the general population, there were also no differences in death, infarction, or stroke between ticagrelor monotherapy and dual antiplatelet therapy, and the same happened with definite/probable thrombosis.

Original Title: Ticagrelor with aspirin or alone after complex PCI: the TWILIGHT-COMPLEX analysis.

Reference: Dangas G et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; Epub ahead of print y presentado en el ACC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....