Virtual ACC 2020 | CARAVAGGIO: Apixaban in Venous Thromboembolism Associated to Cancer

Oral apixaban resulted non-inferior to subcutaneous dalteparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolism associated to cancer with no increase in major bleeding.

The most recent guidelines recommend the use of edoxaban or rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism associated to cancer.  However, the evidence of new anticoagulants in this context is limited and the greatest concern is bleeding increase. 

The CARAVAGGIO randomized over 1100 consecutive patients consecutive patients with cancer who had symptomatic or incidental acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism to receiving apixaban (10 mg twice a day for a week and 5 mg a day thereafter) vs subcutaneous dalteparin (200 UI/kg once a day for the first month followed by 150 UI/kg a day). The treatment was administered for 6 months. 

Recurrent thromboembolism (primary efficacy end point) occurred in 5.6% of patients in the apixaban group vs 7.9% in the dalteparin group (p<0.001 for non-inferiority).


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | PRECOMBAT: 10 Years for Surgery vs. Angioplasty in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.


Major bleeding happened in 3.8% of patients in the apixaban group vs 4% in the dalteparin group (p=0.6).

Conclusion

Oral apixaban resulted non-inferior to subcutaneous dalteparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolism associated to cancer with no increase in major bleeding risk. 

caravaggio

Original Title: Apixaban for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Cancer.

Reference: Giancarlo Agnelli et al. NEJM online before print y presentado en forma virtual en el ACC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....