Antiplatelet Therapy in Elderly Population: Are the New P2Y12 Inhibitors Safe?

Should elderly patients stick to clopidogrel? The first large study on prasugrel showed an unacceptable increase of bleeding in elderly patients, suggesting the use of 5 mg (although the sample size was small, which hindered the determination of dose efficacy).

Antiagregantes en población añosa

Later, ticagrelor showed better efficacy than clopidogrel without apparent safety concerns. However, specific evidence on elderly populations with infarction has always been limited.

This paper published in Circulation gathered information from 14,005 elderly patients—80 years old and up—included in the Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) registry discharged with an indication of aspirin plus clopidogrel (60.2%) or ticagrelor (39.8%) after acute myocardial infarction.

The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of death, infarction, or stroke, and the primary safety endpoint was bleeding after a 1-year follow-up.

The incidence of the composite primary endpoint of ischemic events was basically identical for ticagrelor and clopidogrel (hazard ratio: 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.88–1.06).


Read also: Angioplasty in Aspirin-Free Stable Patients with Prasugrel: Innovation Continues.


When analyzing each individual endpoint, ticagrelor was associated with a 17% higher risk of death and a 48% higher risk of bleeding. At the same time, it presented a 20% lower risk of infarction and an almost 30% lower risk of stroke. The sum of these different risks results in a draw as regards the composite endpoint between ticagrelor and clopidogrel.

A sensitivity analysis in a population <80 years old had different results. For “younger” patients, ticagrelor diminished mortality, infarction, and stroke, without such a pronounced raise in bleeding.

Conclusion

Elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction discharged with ticagrelor show a higher risk of death and bleeding compared to clopidogrel. A randomized study in this population should be conducted.

Original Title: Comparison Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights from the SWEDEHEART Registry.

Reference: Karolina Szummer et al. Circulation. 2020 Nov 3;142(18):1700-1708. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050645.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....