Net Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor reduces ischemic risk in patients with a history of acute myocardial infarction, but it increases the risk of bleeding. Keeping a delicate balance is paramount when prescribing long-term ticagrelor to patients with a history of infarction.

Beneficio clínico neto del ticagrelor a largo plazo

The PEGASUS-TIMI 54 study randomized 21,162 patients with a history of infarction on a 1:1:1 ratio: some received ticagrelor 60 mg twice a day, others ticagrelor 90 mg twice a day, and others received a placebo. All participants also took aspirin with their daily intake. The 60-mg dose of ticagrelor was already approved to be used chronically.

The final endpoints were TIMI major and minor bleeding. The causes of bleeding were categorized by site and etiology, and independent predictors were identified.

After a 3-year follow-up, ticagrelor 60 mg increased the risk of major and minor bleeding by 2% compared with placebo (1.4 % placebo versus 3.4 % ticagrelor).

This difference in bleeding was driven primarily by spontaneous gastrointestinal bleeds. A history of spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization and the presence of anemia were independent predictors of bleeding, but not of ischemic risk. 


Read also: Ticagrelor: Yet Another Pleiotropic Effect?


Patients with at least 1 risk predictor had 3-fold higher rates of bleeding with ticagrelor 60 mg compared with subjects who had none (absolute risk increase, 4.4% versus 1.5%; p = 0.01).

Patients with neither predictor had a more favorable benefit profile with ticagrelor 60 mg twice a day plus low-dose aspirin compared with placebo combined with aspirin. Their benefit profile included a lower mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65 to 0.96; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

In patients with prior myocardial infarction, bleeding is mainly caused by gastrointestinal reasons.

A history of spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or the presence of anemia identified patients at a higher risk of bleeding. Patients with neither of these factors benefited from ticagrelor, even in terms of mortality.

Original Title: Predictors, Type, and Impact of Bleeding on the Net Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Ticagrelor in Stable Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction.

Reference: Giulia Magnani et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e017008. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017008.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....