Net Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor reduces ischemic risk in patients with a history of acute myocardial infarction, but it increases the risk of bleeding. Keeping a delicate balance is paramount when prescribing long-term ticagrelor to patients with a history of infarction.

Beneficio clínico neto del ticagrelor a largo plazo

The PEGASUS-TIMI 54 study randomized 21,162 patients with a history of infarction on a 1:1:1 ratio: some received ticagrelor 60 mg twice a day, others ticagrelor 90 mg twice a day, and others received a placebo. All participants also took aspirin with their daily intake. The 60-mg dose of ticagrelor was already approved to be used chronically.

The final endpoints were TIMI major and minor bleeding. The causes of bleeding were categorized by site and etiology, and independent predictors were identified.

After a 3-year follow-up, ticagrelor 60 mg increased the risk of major and minor bleeding by 2% compared with placebo (1.4 % placebo versus 3.4 % ticagrelor).

This difference in bleeding was driven primarily by spontaneous gastrointestinal bleeds. A history of spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization and the presence of anemia were independent predictors of bleeding, but not of ischemic risk. 


Read also: Ticagrelor: Yet Another Pleiotropic Effect?


Patients with at least 1 risk predictor had 3-fold higher rates of bleeding with ticagrelor 60 mg compared with subjects who had none (absolute risk increase, 4.4% versus 1.5%; p = 0.01).

Patients with neither predictor had a more favorable benefit profile with ticagrelor 60 mg twice a day plus low-dose aspirin compared with placebo combined with aspirin. Their benefit profile included a lower mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65 to 0.96; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

In patients with prior myocardial infarction, bleeding is mainly caused by gastrointestinal reasons.

A history of spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or the presence of anemia identified patients at a higher risk of bleeding. Patients with neither of these factors benefited from ticagrelor, even in terms of mortality.

Original Title: Predictors, Type, and Impact of Bleeding on the Net Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Ticagrelor in Stable Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction.

Reference: Giulia Magnani et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e017008. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017008.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

EuroPCR 2026 | TAVI and Coronary Artery Disease: FFR-Guided PCI Showed Better Outcomes Than an Angiography-Guided Strategy

In patients undergoing TAVI, the concomitant presence of coronary artery disease continues to generate debate: whether coronary lesions should be treated before, during, or...

EuroPCR 2026 | P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After Complex PCI in ACS: Results From the NEO-MINDSET COMPLEX Subanalysis

This is a summary of the NEO-MINDSET COMPLEX subanalysis, presented by Dr. Guy Prado at EuroPCR 2026, which evaluated P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy versus dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | Evolocumab Reduces Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior PCI Without Previous Myocardial Infarction: VESALIUS-CV Results

This presentation, delivered by Dr. Brian A. Bergmark and colleagues at EuroPCR 2026, detailed the results of the VESALIUS-CV trial, focusing specifically on the...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

T-TEER: Beyond Traditional Pulmonary Hypertension Thresholds

Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with progressive functional deterioration, heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and increased mortality. In recent years, transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair...

Is left atrial appendage closure safe in patients with reduced ejection fraction?

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were excluded from the major randomized trials evaluating percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), and...

Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Spain: Sustained Growth and Favorable Real-World Outcomes

Oral anticoagulation remains the standard treatment for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, many patients have a high bleeding risk or contraindications...