ACC 2021 | RAPID-TnT: Usefulness of High-Sensitivity Ultra-Fast Troponin T

Patients under evaluation for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without clear ischemia signs in an electrocardiogram find no benefit in a 0/1-hour high-sensitivity troponin T (ultra-fast) protocol compared with the conventional 0/3-hour protocol.

ACC 2021 | RAPID-TnT: Utilidad de la troponina T ultrasensible y ultra rápida

These data come from the RAPID-TnT trial presented during the scientific sessions at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 2021 Congress, simultaneously published in Circulation.

RAPID-TnT enrolled 3378 patients with suspected ACS and randomized them to a fast-testing protocol (0/1 hour) with a 5th generation high-sensitivity troponin T (detection limit: 4 ng/L) vs. the standard protocol (0/3 hour; detection limit: 29 ng/l). 

The hypothesis of the study was that having this sensitive information faster could aid decision-making and ultimately impact events, something that ultimately did not happen.

The ultra-fast protocol was associated with fewer functional testing and more coronary angiography and revascularization, but it did not translate into differences in mortality or infarction at one year compared with the conventional protocol (5.0% vs. 3.8%; hazard ratio: 1.32; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.83).


Read also: ACC 2021 | Relive Renal Denervation with RADIANCE-HTN TRIO.


Esta información llena un vacío que existía en términos de velocidad de diagnóstico. Se especulaba que cuanto más rápido tuviéramos los datos mejor administraríamos los estudios complementarios y esto finalmente impactaría en eventos clínicos. 

RAPID-TnT

Original Title: Late outcomes of the RAPID-TnT RCT: a 0/1-hour high-sensitivity troponin T protocol in suspected ACS.

Reference: Lambrakis K et al. Presentado en el congreso de la ACC 2021 y publicado simultáneamente en Circulation. 2021;Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055009.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...