AAS vs DAPT post TAVI: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies

Aspirin monotherapy (ASA) reduced the combined risk of thrombotic and bleeding events compared against dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Sangrados mayores en pacientes con AAS más rivaroxabán

This meta-analysis has only reproduced smaller randomize study outcomes and does not include the OCEAN-TAVI registry, the only one that has shown something different so far. 

Even though ASA is positioned as the most acceptable option after TAVR, guidelines still recommend 3-to-6-month DAPT. 

4 randomized studies with over 1,000 patients comparing ASA vs DAPT after TAVR were analyzed in the present meta-analysis. Primary end point was a combination of all-cause mortality, life threatening death, stroke or MI. 

This occurred far less frequently in the group receiving only ASA, both at 30 days (10.3% vs 14.7%, p=0.034) and 3 months (11.0% versus 16.5%, p=0.02) compared with patients receiving DAPT. 


Read also: Efficacy of the Sinopharm Vaccine Against COVID-19.


Post TAVR anticoagulation will remain controversial as long as the information from randomized studies, registries and guidelines remains inconsistent. In this regard, being the TAVR population so heterogeneous, the final answer will take longer. 

Conclusion

Patients with no oral anticoagulation indication undergoing TAVR will benefit from aspirin monotherapy compared against dual antiplatelet therapy. 

JAHA-120-019604free

Original Title: Aspirin Alone Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.

Reference: Jorn Brouwer et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 20;10(8):e019604. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019604.s.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...