Large Differences between Focal and Diffuse Patterns of Stable CAD

PCI is far more successful at reducing ischemia when treating focal stable coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there were no differences in symptoms between both types of CAD. 

Grandes diferencias entre angioplastia en enfermedad focal vs difusa

Physiological assessment with pressure wire pullback can be used to distinguish focal vs diffuse CAD, even though the relevance of this distinction has not been looked at closely. 

Using the ORBITA database, researchers tested PCI efficacy against placebo in both types of CAD patterns (focal vs diffuse). They observed the impact of these patterns on stress echocardiography ischemia and symptom end points. 

164 patients were assessed with iFR pullback before randomization. Focal CAD was defined as iFR drop >0.03 within 15 mm. Greater distances were defined as diffuse CAD. 

Of the 85 patients in the ORBITA PCI branch, 48 showed focal lesions and 37 diffuse CAD. IN the placebo arm (n=79) 35 had focal lesions and 44 diffuse CAD.

Focal stenosis was associated with significantly lower FFR and iFR vs. diffuse pattern patients (mean FFR and iFR, focal 0.60±0.15 and 0.65±0.24, diffuse 0.78±0.10 and 0.88±0.08, respectively, p<0.0001).


Read also: New Markers of Aortic Stenosis Define Asymptomatic Patients.


Stress echocardiography ischemia saw significantly greater reduction with PCI when patients showed a focal pattern, vs. a diffuse pattern (p<0.05). 

PCI did not show significant variation in exercise time pre and post randomization. This continued to be true after stratifying patients according to CAD pattern. 

PCI was superior to placebo when using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire both in frequency and freedom from symptoms. However, these differences continued to be true and similar when stratifying patients into focal and diffuse CAD. 

Conclusion

PCI achieve greater ischemia reduction with focal CAD vs. diffuse. There were no differences in symptom end points. 

CIRCINTERVENTIONS-120-009891

Original Title: Placebo-Controlled Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Focal and Diffuse Patterns of Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Reference: Christopher A Rajkumar et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 3;CIRCINTERVENTIONS120009891. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009891.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....