Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

New Markers of Aortic Stenosis Define Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic aortic stenosis has been keeping us in tense stillness. However, there are new markers capable of identifying patients that might benefit from earlier intervention. In this regard, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been gaining its well-deserved place in cardiology and now more specifically in aortic stenosis. 

Nuevos marcadores de daño en estenosis aórtica que definen pacientes asintomáticos

This study sought to validate CMR markers of prognostic value to aortic stenosis and its thresholds to predict mortality.   

The study prospectively included 799 aortic stenosis patients (n=440 in the derivation cohort and n=359 in the validation cohort) from 13 international centers followed up for nearly 4 years. 

CMR was done shortly before surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR). A forest model was used with 29 variables (13 CMR) capable of predicting mortality and post procedure events. 

There were 52 deaths in the derivation cohort and 51 deaths in the validation cohort. The 4 CMR markers with most predictive power were extracellular volume fraction, late gadolinium enhancement, indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and right ventricular ejection fraction.  

Mortality increased significantly both in the global cohort and among asymptomatic patients when extracellular volume fraction exceeded 27%. 2% of late gadolinium enhancement showed persistent high risk. 


Read also: Anticoagulation with Heparin in Non-Critical COVID-19.


As regards indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume, increased mortality was also observed at both extremes. High (>80 ml/m2) and low volumes (<55 ml/m2) were mortality predictors.  

There was also increased mortality with high (>80%) and low (≤50%) right ventricular ejection fraction (>80% y <50%).

Predictability improved even further when these 4 markers were combined with clinical factors 


Read also: Heparin Anticoagulation in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Results that Differ from the Rest.


The prognostic thresholds and risk stratification by CMR variables were reproduced in the validation cohort. 

Conclusion

Myocardial fibrosis and biventricular remodeling are the best prognostic factors in patients with aortic stenosis. We should highlight its non-linear association with mortality. 

CMR has the potential to optimize decision making in treating patients with aortic stenosis. 

Original Title: Markers of Myocardial Damage Predict Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

Reference: Soongu Kwak et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Aug 10;78(6):545-558. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.047.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...