TCT 2021 | FAVOR III: Angiography-Derived FFR: An Event-Prevention Tool

Compared with visual estimation of lesions, using quantitative angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (quantitative flow ration, QFR) provides better clinical outcomes at one year for angioplasty. These results emerge from the Chinese FAVOR III study, presented at the 2021 TCT scientific sessions and simultaneously published in The Lancet.

TCT 2021 | FAVOR III: FFR derivado de la angiografía: Una herramienta que ahorra eventos

The simplicity and safety offered by QRF—since there is no lesion crossover with a guidewire—should facilitate its implementation in daily clinical practice.

Despite the evidence and the recommendations in all guidelines, fractional flow reserve (FFR) is underused worldwide. This is probably due to several factors: longer procedure time, complications with the guidewire, adverse effects of adenosine (not for iFR), and—last, but not least—costs.

FAVOR III included 3847 patients with stable or unstable coronary disease in 26 sites in China. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 1 year of follow-up.

This composite was significantly lower in those who underwent QFR compared with conventional angiography (5.8% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.0004).

This difference was mostly driven by a lower incidence of infarction in the QRF arm (44 less).


Read also: TCT 2021 | SUGAR Trial: Polymer-Free Stent in Diabetes.


A limitation for this study is that the control group was only assessed using angiography. It would have been interesting to use FFR and compare QFR vs. FFR head-to-head. Additionally, about 20% of patients were not good candidates for QFR due to juxtaposition of other vessels or low imaging quality.

QFR still has a long way to go, but it seems to be arriving at the right time. FFR has had negative outcomes in FAME 3, in stable patients, and in FLOWER-AMI, in acute patients.

Original Title: Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Reference: Xu B et al. Lancet. 2021; Epub ahead of print y presentado simultáneamente en TCT 2021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged...

TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

The current approach to chest pain mainly focuses on symptom characteristics, conducting functional tests for ischemia assessment. However, several randomized clinical trials have shown...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...