TCT 2021 | FAVOR III: Angiography-Derived FFR: An Event-Prevention Tool

Compared with visual estimation of lesions, using quantitative angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (quantitative flow ration, QFR) provides better clinical outcomes at one year for angioplasty. These results emerge from the Chinese FAVOR III study, presented at the 2021 TCT scientific sessions and simultaneously published in The Lancet.

TCT 2021 | FAVOR III: FFR derivado de la angiografía: Una herramienta que ahorra eventos

The simplicity and safety offered by QRF—since there is no lesion crossover with a guidewire—should facilitate its implementation in daily clinical practice.

Despite the evidence and the recommendations in all guidelines, fractional flow reserve (FFR) is underused worldwide. This is probably due to several factors: longer procedure time, complications with the guidewire, adverse effects of adenosine (not for iFR), and—last, but not least—costs.

FAVOR III included 3847 patients with stable or unstable coronary disease in 26 sites in China. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 1 year of follow-up.

This composite was significantly lower in those who underwent QFR compared with conventional angiography (5.8% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.0004).

This difference was mostly driven by a lower incidence of infarction in the QRF arm (44 less).


Read also: TCT 2021 | SUGAR Trial: Polymer-Free Stent in Diabetes.


A limitation for this study is that the control group was only assessed using angiography. It would have been interesting to use FFR and compare QFR vs. FFR head-to-head. Additionally, about 20% of patients were not good candidates for QFR due to juxtaposition of other vessels or low imaging quality.

QFR still has a long way to go, but it seems to be arriving at the right time. FFR has had negative outcomes in FAME 3, in stable patients, and in FLOWER-AMI, in acute patients.

Original Title: Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Reference: Xu B et al. Lancet. 2021; Epub ahead of print y presentado simultáneamente en TCT 2021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...