TCT 2021 | FAVOR III: Angiography-Derived FFR: An Event-Prevention Tool

Compared with visual estimation of lesions, using quantitative angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (quantitative flow ration, QFR) provides better clinical outcomes at one year for angioplasty. These results emerge from the Chinese FAVOR III study, presented at the 2021 TCT scientific sessions and simultaneously published in The Lancet.

TCT 2021 | FAVOR III: FFR derivado de la angiografía: Una herramienta que ahorra eventos

The simplicity and safety offered by QRF—since there is no lesion crossover with a guidewire—should facilitate its implementation in daily clinical practice.

Despite the evidence and the recommendations in all guidelines, fractional flow reserve (FFR) is underused worldwide. This is probably due to several factors: longer procedure time, complications with the guidewire, adverse effects of adenosine (not for iFR), and—last, but not least—costs.

FAVOR III included 3847 patients with stable or unstable coronary disease in 26 sites in China. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 1 year of follow-up.

This composite was significantly lower in those who underwent QFR compared with conventional angiography (5.8% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.0004).

This difference was mostly driven by a lower incidence of infarction in the QRF arm (44 less).


Read also: TCT 2021 | SUGAR Trial: Polymer-Free Stent in Diabetes.


A limitation for this study is that the control group was only assessed using angiography. It would have been interesting to use FFR and compare QFR vs. FFR head-to-head. Additionally, about 20% of patients were not good candidates for QFR due to juxtaposition of other vessels or low imaging quality.

QFR still has a long way to go, but it seems to be arriving at the right time. FFR has had negative outcomes in FAME 3, in stable patients, and in FLOWER-AMI, in acute patients.

Original Title: Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Reference: Xu B et al. Lancet. 2021; Epub ahead of print y presentado simultáneamente en TCT 2021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...