TCT 2021 | FAVOR III: Angiography-Derived FFR: An Event-Prevention Tool

Compared with visual estimation of lesions, using quantitative angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (quantitative flow ration, QFR) provides better clinical outcomes at one year for angioplasty. These results emerge from the Chinese FAVOR III study, presented at the 2021 TCT scientific sessions and simultaneously published in The Lancet.

TCT 2021 | FAVOR III: FFR derivado de la angiografía: Una herramienta que ahorra eventos

The simplicity and safety offered by QRF—since there is no lesion crossover with a guidewire—should facilitate its implementation in daily clinical practice.

Despite the evidence and the recommendations in all guidelines, fractional flow reserve (FFR) is underused worldwide. This is probably due to several factors: longer procedure time, complications with the guidewire, adverse effects of adenosine (not for iFR), and—last, but not least—costs.

FAVOR III included 3847 patients with stable or unstable coronary disease in 26 sites in China. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 1 year of follow-up.

This composite was significantly lower in those who underwent QFR compared with conventional angiography (5.8% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.0004).

This difference was mostly driven by a lower incidence of infarction in the QRF arm (44 less).


Read also: TCT 2021 | SUGAR Trial: Polymer-Free Stent in Diabetes.


A limitation for this study is that the control group was only assessed using angiography. It would have been interesting to use FFR and compare QFR vs. FFR head-to-head. Additionally, about 20% of patients were not good candidates for QFR due to juxtaposition of other vessels or low imaging quality.

QFR still has a long way to go, but it seems to be arriving at the right time. FFR has had negative outcomes in FAME 3, in stable patients, and in FLOWER-AMI, in acute patients.

Original Title: Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Reference: Xu B et al. Lancet. 2021; Epub ahead of print y presentado simultáneamente en TCT 2021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...

Perforation Management in Bifurcations: Bench Testing of Bailout with Covered Stents

Coronary perforations during PCI are one of the most dreaded complications in interventional cardiology, especially in bifurcations. Though rate, this critical situation requires an...

EMERALD II: Non-Invasive Coronary Anatomy and Physiology (CCTA) in ACS Prediction

Despite steady progress in secondary prevention and medical treatment optimization (OMT), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbimortality....

Left or Right Transradial Approach? Comparing Radiation Exposure in Coronary Procedures

Radiation exposure during percutaneous procedures is a problem both for patients and operators. The transradial is currently the preferred approach, vs. femoral; however, whether...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Endoleaks after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: always reintervene or monitor with CTA?

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms requiring sealing above the renal arteries, with preservation of visceral vessels using fenestrated and/or branched devices (F/B-EVAR), has become...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...