AHA 2021 | RAPID CABG: Safety of Early Surgical Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Suspending ticagrelor a couple of days before surgery was non-inferior to waiting 5-6 days in terms of bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring myocardial revascularization surgery. Patients who waited longer had more ischemic events and longer hospitalizations.

AHA 2021 | RAPID CABG: seguridad de ir al quirófano precozmente en un síndrome coronario agudo

Current American guidelines recommend waiting at least 5 days before operating on patients with ACS who received ticagrelor when admitted, while European guidelines recommend only 3 days.

RAPID CABG included 143 patients with ACS (93% of them with multivessel disease) for whom surgery was considered the most adequate strategy. Patients were randomized to undergo surgery between 2-3 days vs. 5-7 days after interrupting ticagrelor.

Mean time-to-surgery was 3 and 6 days in the early and delay arms, respectively.

The primary endpoint, severe bleeding (BARC 3/4), was similar between groups (4.6% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.0253), meaning the early strategy reached non-inferiority.

No patient in the early arm presented recurrent angina during the 2 days of waiting. Something very different occurred in the arm with the longer wait. There were 8.7% of patients with ischemic events, including an infarction.


Read also: AHA 2021 | AVATAR: Early Intervention in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.


Hospitalization length was also shorter in the early surgery arm (9 vs. 12 days).

Original Title: A randomized study of early vs. delayed coronary artery bypass surgery among patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with ticagrelor: the RAPID CABG study.

Reference: So DYF et al. Presentado durante las sesiones científicas del AHA 2021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....