High Risk of Bleeding after PCI: More Evidence for Short DAPT

Dual antiaggregation therapy (DAPT) with ASA and P2Y12 during 6 to 12 months is the indicated strategy after DES stenting to reduce ischemic events. However, in patients with elevated risk of bleeding (HBR) guideline and expert recommendations is 1-6 months, since there is plenty of evidence in favor, except for a randomized study, the MASTER DAPT, and different analysis or registries. 

Alto Riesgo de Sangrado luego de la ATC: más evidencia para DAPT de corta duración

This meta-analysis of 932 studies selected three randomized controlled trials with 8895 patients and 3 studies with 7953 matched with propensity score, all presenting HBR. 8422 of these patients received DAPT from 6 to 12 months (L –DAPT) and 8426 DAPT for 1 to 3 months (S-DAPT).

Patients receiving S-DAPT showed a lower rate of bleeding compared against L-DAPT patients, 2.6% vs. 3.8% [OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51-0.89 absolute risk difference -1.2%]. There were no differences in MACE, or death, stroke, or MI. The presence of stent thrombosis was also similar, even though numerically superior to that of S-DAPT patients, with no statistical significance. 

Conclusion 

Among patients with HBR receiving contemporary drug eluting, S-DAPT reduced bleeding with no increase in risk of death, compared against L-DAPT. Further research is needed to assess late thrombosis after 1-to-3-month DAPT among patients with high ischemic and bleeding risk, to define the SAPT of choice afterwards.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stents in high bleeding risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Reference: Aakash Garg, et al. Am Heart J 2022;250:1–10.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...