Can We Use DAPT for 3 Months in Acute Coronary Syndrome?

Current guidelines recommend 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after DES stenting for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) because of elevated MACE risk. 

¿Podemos utilizar DAPT durante 3 meses en síndromes coronarios agudos?

The development of more modern stents, with thin and ultrathin struts, compared against prior versions, has resulted in more effective devices in terms of stent thrombosis and restenosis. 

Prolonged DAPT has been associated with more bleeding, especially digestive. 

At present, there is evidence (from randomized studies and registries) to support the use of short term DAPT (1-3 months) to reduce bleeding. However, it has not yet been adopted after DES stenting for both acute and chronic coronary syndrome. 

This meta-analysis included 5 randomized studies (REDUCE, RESET‐ACS, SMART‐CHOICE, TICO and TWILIGHT‐ACS) with a total 16781 patients. 8387 receiving 3-month DAPT (49.97%) and receiving 8394 12-month DAPT.

Read also: Invasive Myocardial Viability Indexes.

The groups were similar.

There were no differences between the strategies in MACE (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76–1.11), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.38–4.17), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.48–1.77), MI (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.74–1.30) or stent thrombosis (RR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.55–3.05).

3-month DAPT presented a significant reduction of major bleeding vs 12-month DAPT (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.43–0.64).

Conclusion

In ACS patients undergoing DES stenting, 3-month DAPT reduces bleeding risk with no increase of other complications. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Three versus 12‐month dual antiplatelet therapy duration in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Reference: Vijairam Selvaraj, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100:1151–1158.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....