Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Can We Use DAPT for 3 Months in Acute Coronary Syndrome?

Current guidelines recommend 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after DES stenting for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) because of elevated MACE risk. 

¿Podemos utilizar DAPT durante 3 meses en síndromes coronarios agudos?

The development of more modern stents, with thin and ultrathin struts, compared against prior versions, has resulted in more effective devices in terms of stent thrombosis and restenosis. 

Prolonged DAPT has been associated with more bleeding, especially digestive. 

At present, there is evidence (from randomized studies and registries) to support the use of short term DAPT (1-3 months) to reduce bleeding. However, it has not yet been adopted after DES stenting for both acute and chronic coronary syndrome. 

This meta-analysis included 5 randomized studies (REDUCE, RESET‐ACS, SMART‐CHOICE, TICO and TWILIGHT‐ACS) with a total 16781 patients. 8387 receiving 3-month DAPT (49.97%) and receiving 8394 12-month DAPT.

Read also: Invasive Myocardial Viability Indexes.

The groups were similar.

There were no differences between the strategies in MACE (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76–1.11), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.38–4.17), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.48–1.77), MI (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.74–1.30) or stent thrombosis (RR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.55–3.05).

3-month DAPT presented a significant reduction of major bleeding vs 12-month DAPT (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.43–0.64).

Conclusion

In ACS patients undergoing DES stenting, 3-month DAPT reduces bleeding risk with no increase of other complications. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Three versus 12‐month dual antiplatelet therapy duration in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Reference: Vijairam Selvaraj, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100:1151–1158.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

SCAI 2026 | SELUTION DeNovo subanalysis: Use of sirolimus-eluting balloon in acute coronary syndrome

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains the predominant strategy in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, in recent...

Calcified Nodules and Their Treatment with Rotational Atherectomy

Calcified nodules (CN) represent one of the most complex phenotypes to treat in coronary intervention. They are mainly associated with the need for repeat...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...