EuroPCR 2023 |TAVR in Cardiogenic Shock

Patients presenting aortic stenosis with cardiogenic shock are at extreme risk, with 70% mortality until the aortic obstruction is resolved, and taking into account they make poor transplant candidates. Safety and efficacy of TAVR in patients with cardiogenic shock remains unclear.

The aim of this study was to assess events in patients undergoing TAVR with balloon expandable valves (SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra). 

Populations were matched with propensity score. Primary end point was inhospital all-cause mortality, at 30 days and one year, and major complications in the same period of time. 

Data from 4952 patients with cardiogenic shock were obtained. Mean age was 75.6 year with mean ejection fraction of 39.9%. observed complications were annulus rupture in 0.3%, aortic dissection in 0.2%, 0.4% coronary obstruction, 1% cardiac perforation, 0.2% devise embolization and 0.7% conversion to open surgery. 

Compared against the matched cohort with no cardiogenic shock, there was more inhospital mortality (9.9% vs 2.7%, P<0.0001), stroke (2.9% vs 1.5%; P<0.0001), vascular complications (2.3% vs 1.3%, P<0.0001) and major bleeding (2.5% vs 0.7%, P<0.0001). 

At one year, were was 29.7% mortality vs 22.6% in patients with no cardiogenic shock (HR 1.57, CI 95% 1.43-1.72, P<0.001). After multivariable analysis, predictors of mortality at 30 days were dialysis, pacemaker implantation, assisting device requirement, and peripheral vascular disease. 

Read also: EuroPCR 2023 | Events after Redo TAVR in Balloon-Expandable Valves.

The author concluded that TAVR was effective and safe in the context of cardiogenic shock with acceptable events at 30 days and one year. These outcomes observed in a registry should suggest “primary” TAVR as the best strategy for patients with aortic stenosis leading to cardiogenic shock. 

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Reference: Presented by Abhijeet Dhoble at Late Breaking Trials Sessions, EuroPCR 2023, May 16, 2023, Paris, France.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TAVR in Bicuspid Valves: Higher Prosthesis Mismatch?

TAVR indication is steadily advancing onto younger, lower risk patients.  The presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) has been observed in 0.5% to 2% of...

Edge-to-Edge Repair in Central and Non-Central Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common condition, with approximately 3.5% prevalence in individuals under 65, increasing to 7.7% in those over 75. It can...

Is Angioplasty Always Necessary after TAVR?

Courtesy of: Silvina E. Gomez, MD The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing TAVR is high, ranging from 40 to 70%, according...

TAVR and Anticoagulation: What Should We Do?

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has consolidated as a valid strategy for certain groups of patients. However, approximately one third of those who require...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TAVR in Bicuspid Valves: Higher Prosthesis Mismatch?

TAVR indication is steadily advancing onto younger, lower risk patients.  The presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) has been observed in 0.5% to 2% of...

ROLLER COASTR-EPIC22: Comparison of Plaque Modification Techniques in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

The presence of coronary calcium significantly limits the success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), primarily due to suboptimal stent expansion. This can lead to...

Edge-to-Edge Repair in Central and Non-Central Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common condition, with approximately 3.5% prevalence in individuals under 65, increasing to 7.7% in those over 75. It can...