Outcomes of the Use of Drug Coated Balloons in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions

Drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty offers a novel strategy for treating coronary artery disease. Studies assessing this strategy have shown clinical outcomes comparable to drug-eluting stents’ (DES) in patients with in-stent restenosis and de novo disease in small vessels. However, evidence for the use of DCB in large coronary vessels is limited.

Resultados de la utilización de balones recubiertos de fármacos para el tratamiento de lesiones coronarias de novo

This observational, retrospective study DCB 3.0 included a total of 93 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease treated with DCB angioplasty for de novo lesions (n = 100) in large coronary vessels in 2 centers between July 2020 and June 2022.

Inclusion criteria were: 1) presence of a de novo lesion in a vessel with diameter greater than 3.0 mm, and 2) angioplasty using a DCB with 3.0 mm diameter or greater, regardless concomitant DES stenting.

Patients were mean age 68 ± 11 years, and were mostly men. Mean SYNTAX score was 22 and chronic coronary syndrome was the clinical presentation in 83% of cases. The most treated artery was the anterior descending (48% of patients), followed by the circumflex. Mean lesion length was 45 ± 26 mm, and treated vessels were 3.2 ± 0.3 mm in diameter. 

Read also: Tricuspid Regurgitation: Natural Progression and Prognosis.

The intention-to-treat (ITT) strategy was DCB angioplasty only for 70% of lesions (n = 70), with 6% of cases (n = 6) undergoing rescue DES implantation. The remaining lesions (30%) received a hybrid DCB+DES strategy, which tended to be longer (59.9 ± 22.5 mm vs. 38.1 ± 25.8 mm; p <0.001). Intravascular ultrasound was used in 40% of cases.

Most of DCBs were sirolimus coated (77%), while paclitaxel-coated balloons were used in 18% of cases. Mean number of DCBs per lesion was 1.4 ± 0.8 and balloons were 3.1 ± 0.3 mm in diameter, 35 ± 22 mm long, and were inflated to 12 ± 3 atm. The incidence of angiographically evident coronary artery dissection was 52% (n = 52). Mean follow-up for this cohort was 350 days.

As regards outcomes, the incidence of target vessel failure was 5.1%: 1.5% in the DCB group and 10.7% in the DCB + DES hybrid group (P = 0.0073). There were no cases of cardiac death or target vessel related MI. Target vessel revascularization incidence was 6.6%. 

Read also: MYVAL, a TAVR Balloon-Expandable Valve with Promising Results.

Key findings suggest DCB angioplasty, either alone or in combination with DES stenting, is safe and effective to treat long de novo lesions in large coronary vessels, and leads to the reduction of DES stenting procedures. We look forward to the outcomes of a prospective study (Colombo A. et al. Drug-coated balloons as a first choice for patients with de novo lesions: pros and cons. Eurointervention) to further support this strategy with stronger evidence. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Immediate and follow-up outcomes of drug-coated balloon angioplasty in de novo long lesions on large coronary arteries.

Reference: Pier Pasquale Leone MD, MSc et al EuroIntervention 2023;19.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...