ESC 2024 | MATERHORN Trial: Transcatheter vs. Surgical Mitral Repair in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

European guidelines consider transcatheter therapy as an alternative for patients with secondary mitral regurgitation who are not surgical candidates (recommendation IIa). Based on this, a working group in Germany conducted a randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority study comparing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with surgical repair.

Patients enrolled had secondary mitral regurgitation, ejection fraction greater than 20%, and remained symptomatic despite optimal medical treatment, but without associated valve disease.

Regarding the primary efficacy endpoint, which included a composite of death, heart failure (HF) rehospitalization, mitral reintervention, stroke, or ventricular assist device implantation, there was an advantage for the TEER arm, with greater event-free survival (odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-1.44; p-non-inferiority <0.001).

In the safety evaluation, considering major adverse events (MAE) at 30 days, 54.8% of patients in the surgical group experienced MAE, compared to 14.9% in the TEER arm.

Read also: ESC 2024 | RESHAPE-HF2: MitraClip in Heart Failure and Moderate to Severe Mitral Regurgitation.

The study concluded that transcatheter therapy was noninferior in terms of clinical efficacy and showed a superior safety profile. Therefore, the authors suggest that this option should be considered for patients with secondary mitral regurgitation who are eligible for surgery, regardless of surgical risk.

Presented by Volker Rudolph at the Hot-Line Sessions, ESC Congress 2024, August 30-September 2, London, England.  


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...