ESC 2024 | RHEIA Trial: Transcatheter vs. Surgical Replacement in Women

The RHEIA trial is the first randomized, women-exclusive international study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared to surgery in symptomatic women with severe aortic stenosis. It excluded patients with bicuspid aortic valve, non-calcified valve, complex coronary artery disease, or with predictors of complications for TAVI or surgery.

El estudio incluyó a 443 pacientes, aleatorizados 1:1 para recibir TAVI con dispositivos Sapien 3/3U o cirugía con cualquier válvula disponible. El punto final primario fue la incidencia de eventos adversos a un año, incluyendo mortalidad, accidente cerebrovascular (ACV) y rehospitalización.

The study enrolled 443 patients, randomized 1:1 to receive TAVI with Sapien 3/3U devices or surgery with any available valve. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events at one year, including mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization.

The average age of the participants was 73 years, and they were at low risk (STS score 2.2). Between 70-75% of the women had a small aortic annulus (<430 mm²). The primary endpoint showed an event rate of 15.6% in the surgical group versus 8.9% in the TAVI group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.88; Log-rank p=0.03). This showed both non-inferiority and superiority for TAVI in the studied events.

Breaking down the primary endpoint, the TAVI group had lower rates of mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization in particular. In terms of safety, the TAVI group had a higher incidence of vascular complications (3.3% vs. 0.5%; p=0.007) and need for pacemaker (8.8% vs. 2.9%; p=0.001), and a lower rate of atrial fibrillation (-25.5%; p<0.001).

Read also: ESC 2024 | NOTION 3 Trial: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with a Planned Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

The authors concluded that treatment with the SAPIEN 3 or SAPIEN 3 Ultra devices showed superiority regarding the primary endpoint, with fewer rehospitalizations and less use of inpatient resources compared to surgery.

Presented by Helene Eltchaninoff at the Hot-Line Sessions, ESC Congress 2024, August 30-September 2, London, England.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...