Six Months Sufficient for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Reference: Kandzari DE, Barrer CS, Leon MB, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy duration and clinical outcomes following treatment with zotarolimus-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 1119-28.2011; 4: 1119-28.

Patients treated with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) suffer no excess late ischemic events if they take dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 months instead of 12 months or longer, according to a study in the October 2011 issue of JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.

Researchers led by David E. Kandzari, MD, of the Piedmont Heart Institute (Atlanta, GA), looked at 2,032 patients undergoing PCI with ZES in 5 registration trials from Medtronic’s (Santa Rosa, CA) Endeavor program. Of these, 1,414 were identified as event-free and on dual antiplatelet therapy at 6 months. Outcomes were compared in patients based on antiplatelet therapy duration at 6, 12, and 24 months.

Dual antiplatelet therapy compliance was 100% at 6 months, 47.9% at 12 months, 38.5% at 24 months, and 28.8% at 3 years. “In this analysis limited to clinically stable patients undergoing elective percutaneous revascularization with ZES and censored for early (< 6 months) adverse events, late (3 years) safety outcomes were independent of dual antiplatelet therapy treatment durations ranging from 6 months to greater than 2 years,” the researchers conclude.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...