Six Months Sufficient for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Reference: Kandzari DE, Barrer CS, Leon MB, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy duration and clinical outcomes following treatment with zotarolimus-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 1119-28.2011; 4: 1119-28.

Patients treated with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) suffer no excess late ischemic events if they take dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 months instead of 12 months or longer, according to a study in the October 2011 issue of JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.

Researchers led by David E. Kandzari, MD, of the Piedmont Heart Institute (Atlanta, GA), looked at 2,032 patients undergoing PCI with ZES in 5 registration trials from Medtronic’s (Santa Rosa, CA) Endeavor program. Of these, 1,414 were identified as event-free and on dual antiplatelet therapy at 6 months. Outcomes were compared in patients based on antiplatelet therapy duration at 6, 12, and 24 months.

Dual antiplatelet therapy compliance was 100% at 6 months, 47.9% at 12 months, 38.5% at 24 months, and 28.8% at 3 years. “In this analysis limited to clinically stable patients undergoing elective percutaneous revascularization with ZES and censored for early (< 6 months) adverse events, late (3 years) safety outcomes were independent of dual antiplatelet therapy treatment durations ranging from 6 months to greater than 2 years,” the researchers conclude.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | VANISH2 Trial

Cardiac defibrillator implants (CDIs) have been shown to improve survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, approximately one third of...

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2024 – BPROAD

Hypertension (elevated blood pressure, BP) is the most common comorbidity among diabetic patients and has been associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though as a...

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...