To discontinue clopidogrel after a year of infarction can be risky

Reference: Charlot et al. European Heart Journal 2012 (in press).

International guideline recommendations approve giving dual antiplatelet therapy for a period of not less than 12 months after acute myocardial infarction. However, the benefit is unknown if the therapy is extended beyond 12 months. Perhaps its extension could be particularly useful in patients receiving pharmacological stent implantation, due to the inherent risk of late thrombosis. A recent retrospective analysis of the Danish National Registry (2004-2009) assessed the risk of discontinuing dual antiplatelet therapy during the first three months after the monitoring year. From a total of 29,268 patients, 9,819 (33.6%) were treated conservatively and 19,449 (66.4%) by angioplasty. A total of 3,214 patients had a follow-up event (11%). After 12 months of infarction, patients treated conservatively had a similar risk (death or MI) when clopidogrel was discontinued in the first quarter compared with those in the second quarter: 1.07 (0.65-1.76, P = 0.79). In contrast, patients undergoing angioplasty had a higher risk when clopidogrel was discontinued in the first quarter, relative risk 1.59 (1.11-2.30, P = 0.013). For this subgroup, the risk of discontinuation was higher in patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation, relative risk 2.65 (1.25-5.64, P = 0.011).

Comments:

Overall, patients where dual antiplatelet therapy is prolonged beyond the year of infarction constitute a risk group in themselves and can hardly be compared with patients who experience an early interruption of the drug.

To circumvent this problem and assess the need for prolonged therapy with clopidogrel, Danish researchers used the same patients as a reference, comparing the risk of discontinuing the drug in two consecutive periods which demonstrated the presence of a significant risk in the first 90 days after the year follow-up for patients undergoing angioplasty.

There is no doubt that no risk over the conservative group gives rise to speculation. Risk may be present due to late thrombosis, especially in patients receiving a first-generation stent drug. On the other hand, we cannot rule out the rebound effect, both in the territory treated as well as in other territories. Unfortunately, the study did not assess the causes of this excess risk. Although a hypothesis generator, the study suggests a different duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients treated with angioplasty to those treated conservatively. Future studies will need to confirm or disprove these findings.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....