Risk scores in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Original title: Walking Beyond the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) Model in the Death Risk Stratification During Hospitalization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome. Reference: Rapouseiras-Roubín S, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2012;5:1117–25.

Discriminatory power of risk score predictors become fundamental in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. This tool lets you define, for example, which patients will benefit most from more aggressive strategies such as early percutaneous revascularization.

Accordingly, several risk scores have been proposed. One of the most widely used in medical practice, the GRACE score, was drafted in 2003 and rapidly became popular owing to its wide applicability. Another widely used score is the one we set in this context; ACTION.

The aim of this study in a single center in Spain was to compare the predictive ability of traditional risk scores, (GRACE and ACTION), with more contemporary scores, (EHS and NCDR). 4,497 consecutive patients were included, of whom 32.1% had MI with ST-segment elevation. Traditional scores from the predictors GRACE and ACTION showed an excellent performance in predicting. Additionally, the more recent prediction scores from NCDR and EHS were not superior to the traditional in this context.

Conclusion 

The GRACE score remains a tool with great clinical applicability for the prediction of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Editorial Comment:

The major limitation of the study lies in the fact it came from a single center whose inclusion of patients was performed consecutively. However, the significant number of patients included allows generalizing the conclusion (external validity) that the GRACE score remains one of the most useful tools for predicting cardiovascular risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Courtesy of Dr. Marco Wainstein
Editorial Board Member

Dr. Marco Wainstein

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...