Chronic Type B Dissection, better with endoprosthesis than with medical treatment

Original title: The results of stent graft versus medication therapy for chronic type B dissection Reference: Xin Jia et al. J Vasc Surg 2013;57:406-14

In many institutions patients with Chronic Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection is most often treated medically, and the thoracic endovascular aortic repair implant TEVAR or the surgical procedure are reserved for those who evolve with complications (persistent pain, expansion of false lumen, visceral or peripheral ischemia). 

Even though these complications may not present, the prognosis for these patients continues to be around 30% mortality at 2 years. This prospective study included 303 consecutive patients with chronic type B aortic dissection that received, following medical criteria, optimal medical therapy (OMT) (95 patients) or thoracic endovascular aorta repair (TEVAR) (208 patients). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The median time between dissection and endoprosthesis was 23 days. 

No deaths occurred during index hospitalization in the two groups. The TEVAR group 2 patients (0,9%) required emergency surgery for retrograde type A dissection, 6 patients (2,9%) had vascular complications, 2 patients (0,9%) presented neurological compromise and 2 patients (0,9%) periprocedural infarction. No patients in the OMT group presented events in 30 days.

Conclusion 

This multicenter, prospective and not randomized study, showed lower mortality with TEVAR in treating chronic type B aortic dissection vs. OMT. However, global mortality showed no differences.

Editorial comment

Follow up was lost in more than 20% of patients in both groups but especially in the OMT group (as expected). This makes it difficult to interpret results at long term, precisely when benefits of precocious intervention should be seen. Beyond this limitation, this study shows a very acceptable complications rate at 30 days with the intervention, which raises questions about the efficiency of the traditional management of these patients.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...

Transcatheter Deep Vein Arterialization in Critical Limb Ischemia Without Revascularization Options

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia in patients without conventional revascularization options represents one of the most challenging scenarios within peripheral arterial disease, with 1-year major amputation...

Duration of Smoking Cessation and Risk of Amputation After Revascularization in Critical Limb Ischemia

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is associated with high rates of amputation and mortality. Although smoking cessation improves outcomes after revascularization, the impact of the...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

OCT- and IVUS-Guided Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has reduced mortality in the acute phase. However, recurrent ACS and target vessel...

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...