TAVI also for pure aortic insufficiency

Original title: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Pure Severe Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation. Reference: David A. Roy et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013. Article in press.

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVI) has become a standard treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis and a high surgical risk.

However for those patients who have pure aortic insufficiency, (failure without associated stenosis), nothing has yet been published. This is a world record that included 43 volunteer patients with pure aortic insufficiency treated with TAVI using Valve Core valve, (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). All patients were rejected for surgery with a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 26.9 ± 17.9%. 

The average measurement of the aortic ring was 24 ± 2.3 mm and the most commonly used valve was n° 29. In 42 of the 43 patients (97.7%) it was possible to implant the valve, with 8 patients (18.6%) requiring a second valve for residual aortic insufficiency

All patients requiring a second valve had an absence of calcium in the ring, (p = 0.014). Post implant they showed aortic insufficiency of grade I or less 34 patients, (79.1%). Death from any cause whatsoever at one year was 21.4%.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates the feasibility and potential difficulties of treating patients with pure aortic surgery by percutaneous aortic valve implantation with Core Valve prosthesis. The chances of significant aortic insufficiency, despite the implant, persists or that more than one valve will be needed should be considered before making the decision.

Editorial comment: 

The frequent absence of calcium that serves as a guide becomes more challenging for the implant in these patients compared to those with stenosis and is usually a harmful ring calcification. In case the significant aortic insufficiency remains after the release, it is unlikely, (in the absence of calcium), that the post dilatation improves the situation which leaves no choice but the implantation of a second valve. The worst prognosis was for patients with aortic regurgitation and aneurysmal dilatation of the ascending aorta, (3 out of 4 died within 6 months). This suggests (despite the small number of patients) that TAVI does not alter the course of the disease when the failure is associated with root dilatation.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...